Few NFL rivalries carry the weight of Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears. When these teams meet, the box score tells only part of the story. The latest chapter was even more dramatic: Chicago erased a 10-point fourth-quarter deficit and defeated Green Bay 31-27 in the 2025 NFC Wild Card game on January 10, 2026, turning a playoff game that appeared to be slipping away into one of the most memorable recent meetings between the rivals.
The individual numbers were just as compelling. Jordan Love threw four touchdown passes without an interception, while Caleb Williams produced 361 passing yards and two touchdowns despite throwing two interceptions. Colston Loveland led Chicago with 137 receiving yards, while Romeo Doubs paced Green Bay with 124 yards and a touchdown.
This breakdown covers the Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears match player stats, the biggest performances, key turning points, recent rivalry history, and what the numbers reveal about the two teams.
Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats at a Glance
| Category | Green Bay Packers | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Final Score | 27 | 31 |
| Passing Yards | 323 | 361 |
| Rushing Yards | 99 | 93 |
| Total Yards | 421 | 445 |
| First Downs | 21 | 24 |
| Third Down | 6/15 | 10/19 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Time of Possession | 27:19 | 32:41 |
| Passing TDs | 4 | 2 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Red-Zone Efficiency | 3/3 | 2/5 |
Chicago finished with 445 total yards compared with Green Bay’s 421, but the more striking difference was what happened on third down and in the fourth quarter. The Bears converted 10 of 19 third downs, while Green Bay went 6 of 15.
Jordan Love vs Caleb Williams: Quarterback Stats
The quarterback matchup was one of the most interesting parts of the game.
Jordan Love’s performance
Green Bay quarterback Jordan Love completed 24 of 46 passes for 323 yards and four touchdowns, with no interceptions. His passer rating was 103.8, and he was sacked only once.
Love’s touchdown passes went to four different receivers:
- Christian Watson — 7 yards
- Jayden Reed — 18 yards
- Romeo Doubs — 1 yard
- Matthew Golden — 23 yards
That distribution shows how Green Bay moved the ball through several parts of its passing attack rather than relying on one receiver.
Love also contributed 11 rushing yards on one carry.
The difficult part for Green Bay was that Love’s excellent passing performance did not translate into a victory. His four touchdown passes gave the Packers a 27-16 advantage late in the fourth quarter, but Chicago’s final surge completely changed the game.
Caleb Williams’ performance
Williams completed 24 of 48 passes for 361 yards, two touchdowns and two interceptions. His passer rating was 71.6. He also rushed four times for 20 yards.
On the surface, Love’s stat line was more efficient. Williams, however, produced more passing yards and kept attacking despite the mistakes.
His two touchdown passes were especially important because both came during Chicago’s fourth-quarter comeback:
- 8-yard touchdown pass to Olamide Zaccheaus
- 25-yard touchdown pass to D.J. Moore
The second touchdown gave Chicago its winning points.
Quarterback comparison
| Stat | Jordan Love | Caleb Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 24 | 24 |
| Attempts | 46 | 48 |
| Completion % | 52.2% | 50.0% |
| Passing Yards | 323 | 361 |
| Yards/Attempt | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Passing TDs | 4 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 103.8 | 71.6 |
| Rushing Yards | 11 | 20 |
The comparison captures the strange nature of the game: Green Bay’s quarterback produced the cleaner statistical performance, but Chicago’s quarterback made the late plays that decided the result.
Green Bay Packers Player Stats
Passing
Jordan Love: 24/46, 323 yards, 4 TD, 0 INT, 103.8 rating.
There was little to criticize in Love’s touchdown production. He consistently found open receivers and produced four scoring throws despite Chicago’s defensive pressure.
The bigger issue for Green Bay came elsewhere, particularly the inability to close the game after building a double-digit fourth-quarter advantage.
Rushing
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 19 | 55 | 2.9 | 0 | 13 |
| Chris Brooks | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 |
| Jayden Reed | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 |
| Jordan Love | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Team | 23 | 99 | 4.3 | 0 | 16 |
Josh Jacobs received the majority of Green Bay’s rushing workload, but the Bears held the Packers to only 99 rushing yards. Jacobs averaged just 2.9 yards per carry.
Receiving
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romeo Doubs | 8 | 124 | 15.5 | 1 | 34 |
| Matthew Golden | 4 | 84 | 21.0 | 1 | 36 |
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 1 | 20 |
| Christian Watson | 3 | 36 | 12.0 | 1 | 22 |
| Chris Brooks | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Luke Musgrave | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Josh Whyle | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| Darian Kinnard | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Josh Jacobs | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
Doubs was Green Bay’s most productive receiver by yardage and receptions. He caught 8 of 11 targets for 124 yards and a touchdown, giving Love a dependable option throughout the game.
Golden’s four catches for 84 yards were also significant. His 36-yard reception was Green Bay’s longest completion to a receiver in the game.
Chicago Bears Player Stats
Passing
Caleb Williams: 24/48, 361 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT, 71.6 rating.
Williams’ numbers were unusual for a playoff comeback. He threw two interceptions, completed only half of his passes, and still finished with more than 360 passing yards.
That happened because Chicago continued to attack downfield. The Bears eventually found enough explosive plays to turn a 27-16 deficit into a four-point victory.
Rushing
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D’Andre Swift | 13 | 54 | 4.2 | 1 | 8 |
| Kyle Monangai | 8 | 27 | 3.4 | 0 | 9 |
| Caleb Williams | 4 | 20 | 5.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Cole Kmet | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Luther Burden | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | -4 |
| D.J. Moore | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | -5 |
| Team | 28 | 93 | 3.3 | 1 | 11 |
D’Andre Swift led the Bears in rushing and scored Chicago’s first touchdown of the fourth-quarter comeback. His 54 rushing yards were modest by normal standards, but his touchdown helped trigger the late offensive surge.
Receiving
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colston Loveland | 6 | 137 | 22.8 | 0 |
| D.J. Moore | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 1 |
| Rome Odunze | 2 | 44 | 22.0 | 0 |
| Luther Burden | 3 | 42 | 14.0 | 0 |
| D’Andre Swift | 2 | 38 | 19.0 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 1 |
| Kyle Monangai | 1 | 22 | 22.0 | 0 |
| Durham Smythe | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
Colston Loveland was Chicago’s leading receiver, finishing with 6 receptions for 137 yards. His 22.8-yard average per catch demonstrates how effectively Chicago generated chunk plays through the passing game.
D.J. Moore’s numbers were less spectacular overall, but his biggest catch came at the perfect time: his 25-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter put Chicago ahead.
How the Packers vs Bears Game Changed in the Fourth Quarter
The game can almost be viewed as two different contests.
First three quarters
Green Bay controlled much of the early action and entered the fourth quarter with a 21-6 lead. Love had already thrown three touchdown passes, while Chicago struggled to turn possessions into touchdowns.
The Packers extended the advantage to 27-16 after Love connected with Matthew Golden for a 23-yard touchdown.
Fourth-quarter comeback
Then the momentum flipped.
Chicago scored twice through the air during the final quarter, including Williams’ touchdown to Zaccheaus and his late scoring connection with Moore.
The Bears finished the comeback with 25 fourth-quarter points, while Green Bay managed six.
Game flow:
GB early control → Love's 4 TD passes → 27-16 lead → Chicago fourth-quarter surge → Williams finds Moore → Bears win 31-27
That sequence is why looking only at the final quarterback numbers misses the heart of the game.
Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears Recent Matchup History
The rivalry became especially dramatic during the 2025 season because the teams met three times.
| Date | Result | Venue |
|---|---|---|
| Dec. 7, 2025 | Packers 28, Bears 21 | Lambeau Field |
| Dec. 20, 2025 | Bears 22, Packers 16 OT | Soldier Field |
| Jan. 10, 2026 | Bears 31, Packers 27 | Soldier Field |
The first meeting went Green Bay’s way. Jordan Love completed 17 of 25 passes for 234 yards and three touchdowns, while Josh Jacobs produced a critical late run that helped set up his go-ahead touchdown.
The second meeting was a completely different story. Chicago trailed 16-6 with less than two minutes remaining, then scored 10 points to force overtime. Williams ultimately connected with Moore for a 46-yard overtime touchdown, completing a dramatic 22-16 comeback.
The playoff rematch followed three weeks later and produced another Chicago comeback.
What the Player Stats Tell Us
1. Green Bay’s passing attack was highly productive
Four touchdown passes from Love is a major offensive output in a playoff game. Green Bay also had four different players catch touchdown passes.
The Packers therefore weren’t dependent on a single scoring option.
2. Chicago created more total offense
The Bears produced 445 total yards, compared with Green Bay’s 421. Chicago also recorded more first downs and converted third downs at a higher rate.
Those extra opportunities became especially valuable once the fourth quarter began.
3. Turnovers didn’t tell the whole story
Green Bay committed zero turnovers, while Chicago turned the ball over twice through Williams’ interceptions. Yet Chicago still won.
That’s unusual and highlights how much the Bears gained from their late offensive efficiency.
4. Loveland was a major factor
Colston Loveland’s 137 receiving yards were the most on either team. His ability to generate more than 20 yards per reception gave Chicago a reliable source of explosive plays.
5. Red-zone efficiency favored Green Bay
The Packers went 3-for-3 in the red zone, while Chicago went 2-for-5. In other words, Green Bay was more efficient when it got close to the goal line.
Chicago ultimately overcame that disadvantage by producing explosive plays from farther away.
Why This Rivalry Remains So Significant
The Packers and Bears first met in 1921, and their rivalry has become one of the defining fixtures in NFL history. By the end of the 2025 season and playoffs, Green Bay held a 109-98-6 all-time advantage, while Chicago held a 2-1 postseason edge.
The rivalry is also unusual because both organizations have deep historical roots. Their meetings have included legendary players, championship races and numerous games decided by late defensive or offensive plays.
Recent history has added a new layer through the emergence of Jordan Love and Caleb Williams as quarterbacks central to their teams’ futures.
The Most Important Player Matchups
Jordan Love vs Caleb Williams
This is becoming the central quarterback storyline of the rivalry.
Love brings more experience within Green Bay’s offensive system, while Williams represents Chicago’s younger quarterback era. Their contrasting statistical profiles in the latest playoff game — Love’s four touchdowns against Williams’ higher yardage total — showed how differently a quarterback can influence a game.
Josh Jacobs vs D’Andre Swift
The two running backs had similar production in the playoff game:
- Jacobs: 55 yards
- Swift: 54 yards
Swift scored a touchdown, while Jacobs did not. Neither running game dominated, which pushed the game toward the quarterbacks and receivers.
Romeo Doubs vs Colston Loveland
Doubs was Green Bay’s leading receiver with 124 yards, but Loveland finished with 137 yards for Chicago.
That 13-yard difference was small statistically, but Loveland’s production came during a comeback in which every explosive reception mattered.
Packers vs Bears 2026 Schedule
The rivalry is already scheduled to continue twice during the 2026 NFL regular season.
The first meeting is set for Sunday, October 11, 2026, at 3:25 p.m. CT at Lambeau Field. Green Bay’s official schedule lists the Bears as the Week 5 opponent.
The teams will meet again on Friday, December 25, 2026, in Chicago at noon CT.
That means fans will get another opportunity to watch Love and Williams face each other in one of the NFL’s most established rivalries.
Key Player Stats to Remember
For anyone searching specifically for Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears match player stats, these are the numbers from the latest playoff meeting worth remembering:
Green Bay Packers
- Jordan Love: 24/46, 323 yards, 4 TD, 0 INT
- Romeo Doubs: 8 receptions, 124 yards, 1 TD
- Matthew Golden: 4 receptions, 84 yards, 1 TD
- Josh Jacobs: 19 carries, 55 yards
- Christian Watson: 3 receptions, 36 yards, 1 TD
Chicago Bears
- Caleb Williams: 24/48, 361 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT
- Colston Loveland: 6 receptions, 137 yards
- D.J. Moore: 6 receptions, 64 yards, 1 TD
- D’Andre Swift: 13 carries, 54 yards, 1 TD
- Olamide Zaccheaus: 1 reception, 8 yards, 1 TD
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the latest Packers vs Bears game?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Green Bay Packers 31-27 in the NFC Wild Card playoff game on January 10, 2026, at Soldier Field.
What were Jordan Love’s stats against the Bears?
Love completed 24 of 46 passes for 323 yards, four touchdowns and zero interceptions, producing a 103.8 passer rating.
What were Caleb Williams’ stats against the Packers?
Williams completed 24 of 48 passes for 361 yards, two touchdowns and two interceptions. He also rushed for 20 yards.
Who had the most receiving yards in the Packers vs Bears playoff game?
Chicago tight end Colston Loveland led all players with 137 receiving yards on six receptions.
Who was Green Bay’s leading receiver?
Romeo Doubs led the Packers with eight receptions for 124 yards and one touchdown.
How many times did the Packers and Bears play in 2025?
They met three times during the 2025 season and postseason. Green Bay won the December 7 regular-season meeting 28-21, while Chicago won the December 20 meeting 22-16 in overtime and the January 10 playoff meeting 31-27.
When is the next Packers vs Bears game?
The next scheduled meeting is October 11, 2026, at Lambeau Field, with kickoff scheduled for 3:25 p.m. CT. They are also scheduled to meet in Chicago on Christmas Day, December 25, 2026.
Who leads the all-time Packers vs Bears rivalry?
Through the 2025 season and postseason, Green Bay leads the all-time series 109-98-6. Chicago, however, leads the postseason series 2-1.
Final Takeaway
The latest Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears match player stats tell a fascinating story. Jordan Love threw four touchdowns without an interception, Green Bay produced 421 yards and scored on all three of its red-zone trips. On paper, those numbers look like the foundation of a playoff victory.
But Chicago’s fourth-quarter execution changed everything. Caleb Williams threw for 361 yards, Colston Loveland generated 137 receiving yards, and D.J. Moore delivered the decisive touchdown. The Bears turned a 27-16 deficit into a 31-27 victory, adding another unforgettable chapter to a rivalry that has been producing dramatic games for more than a century.
And the story is far from finished. With two Packers-Bears meetings already scheduled for the 2026 regular season, the next set of player stats will add another chapter to one of the NFL’s longest-running rivalries.
