The San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers match player stats tell a story that goes well beyond the final scores. When these teams met in the 2026 Western Conference first round, San Antonio’s combination of Victor Wembanyama’s interior dominance, De’Aaron Fox’s shot creation and Stephon Castle’s all-around play proved too much for Portland to handle over five games.
The series had its twists. Portland stole Game 2 on the road, briefly leveling the series at 1–1 after falling behind by 14 points. San Antonio responded by winning the next three games, including a 114–95 closeout victory in Game 5 at Frost Bank Center.
For fans searching for Spurs vs Trail Blazers player stats, the numbers reveal several different stories. Deni Avdija emerged as Portland’s leading scorer across the series, while Fox and Castle provided steady production for San Antonio. Wembanyama, meanwhile, made his biggest impact where the box score often looks most intimidating: rebounds and blocked shots.
San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers Series Summary
| Game | Date | Result | Leading Scorer | Series |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Game 1 | April 19, 2026 | Spurs 111, Trail Blazers 98 | Victor Wembanyama, 35 pts | Spurs 1–0 |
| Game 2 | April 21, 2026 | Trail Blazers 106, Spurs 103 | Scoot Henderson, 31 pts | 1–1 |
| Game 3 | April 24, 2026 | Spurs 120, Trail Blazers 108 | Stephon Castle, 33 pts | Spurs 2–1 |
| Game 4 | April 26, 2026 | Spurs 114, Trail Blazers 93 | De’Aaron Fox, 28 pts | Spurs 3–1 |
| Game 5 | April 28, 2026 | Spurs 114, Trail Blazers 95 | Deni Avdija, 22 pts | Spurs win 4–1 |
The five-game series was decided by San Antonio’s consistency. Portland won Game 2, but the Spurs controlled the other four contests.
Key Player Stats: Spurs vs Trail Blazers
The most useful way to understand the series is to look at the production over all five games rather than focusing on one box score.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
| Player | Games | PPG | RPG | APG | FG% | 3P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De’Aaron Fox | 5 | 20.2 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 50.0% | 37.0% |
| Stephon Castle | 5 | 19.8 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 43.4% | 40.7% |
| Victor Wembanyama | 4 | 21.0 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 58.3% | 53.8% |
| Devin Vassell | 5 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Julian Champagnie | 5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Wembanyama appeared in four games in the series, but his per-game numbers were spectacular: 21.0 points, 8.8 rebounds and 4.0 blocks while shooting 58.3% from the field and 53.8% from three-point range. Fox averaged 20.2 points and 6.8 assists, while Castle posted 19.8 points and 6.0 assists.
Portland Trail Blazers Player Stats
| Player | Games | PPG | RPG | APG | FG% | 3P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deni Avdija | 5 | 22.2 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 44.9% | 35.0% |
| Jrue Holiday | 5 | 16.4 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 40.3% | 35.3% |
| Scoot Henderson | 5 | 15.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 47.5% | 46.4% |
Avdija was Portland’s most consistent offensive player during the series, averaging 22.2 points, 6.0 rebounds and 4.6 assists. Jrue Holiday provided veteran playmaking with 7.2 assists per game, while Scoot Henderson supplied scoring and perimeter shooting.
Victor Wembanyama Set the Tone for San Antonio
If there was one player who changed the geometry of the series, it was Victor Wembanyama.
His impact was not limited to scoring. Portland had to account for his length around the rim on practically every possession, and his rebounding and shot-blocking allowed San Antonio to defend aggressively elsewhere.
In Game 1, Wembanyama scored 35 points as the Spurs opened the series with a 111–98 victory.
His strongest statistical showing came in the closeout game. Wembanyama finished Game 5 with 17 points, 14 rebounds and six blocks, helping San Antonio eliminate Portland 114–95.
The six blocks are particularly important because they explain why a player can dominate a game without scoring 30 points. Every blocked shot can erase a scoring opportunity, but the defensive pressure created by Wembanyama’s presence affects shots that never become blocks.
De’Aaron Fox Provided the Spurs With a Second Offensive Engine
Wembanyama attracts attention inside. Fox creates problems outside.
That combination made San Antonio difficult to defend. If Portland collapsed toward Wembanyama, Fox could attack space. If defenders stayed home on Fox, Wembanyama had more room to operate around the basket and the Spurs could exploit mismatches.
Fox averaged 20.2 points and 6.8 assists during the five-game series while shooting 50% from the field.
His Game 4 performance was especially significant. Fox scored 28 points, helping San Antonio take a 3–1 series lead with a 114–93 victory in Portland.
In Game 5, he added 21 points and nine assists, shooting 8-for-14 from the field. His +26 plus/minus was also the best mark among the Spurs’ starters in the closeout victory.
Stephon Castle Emerged as Another Major Factor
Castle’s series showed why counting only points can miss an important part of a player’s value.
The young guard averaged 19.8 points and 6.0 assists across the five games. He also shot 40.7% from three-point range during the series.
His signature performance came in Game 3, when he scored 33 points as San Antonio reclaimed control of the series with a 120–108 win.
Castle also finished Game 5 with 15 points, five assists and a block, although his seven turnovers show that his aggressive ball-handling came with some risk.
That balance is worth watching. Castle’s ability to create offense gives San Antonio another player defenses cannot simply ignore, but limiting turnovers will remain important against stronger playoff opponents.
Deni Avdija Was Portland’s Most Reliable Scorer
Portland did not go quietly.
Avdija averaged 22.2 points per game, the highest scoring average among either team’s players over the five-game series. He also contributed 6.0 rebounds and 4.6 assists per game.
His best overall performance came in Game 1, when he recorded 30 points and 10 rebounds in his first career playoff game. Portland ultimately lost that contest, but Avdija gave the Trail Blazers a clear offensive foundation.
He continued producing in Game 5, scoring 22 points despite Portland’s difficult shooting night. The problem for the Trail Blazers was that they needed more consistent scoring around him as the series progressed.
Game 2: Portland’s Biggest Statement
The most important Portland performance came in Game 2.
The Trail Blazers erased a 14-point deficit and defeated San Antonio 106–103, tying the series at one game apiece. Scoot Henderson led Portland with 31 points, giving the young guard one of the biggest scoring nights of the matchup.
That comeback temporarily changed the mood of the series.
Instead of San Antonio heading to Portland with a 2–0 advantage, both teams entered Game 3 with the series level. Portland had momentum, home-court confidence and proof that it could survive a difficult Spurs run.
San Antonio answered immediately.
Game 3 Changed the Direction of the Series
Game 3 belonged to Stephon Castle.
Castle scored 33 points, and the Spurs won 120–108 to take a 2–1 lead.
Portland’s Deni Avdija still contributed nine assists in the game, showing how the Trail Blazers tried to create offense beyond pure scoring. But San Antonio’s balanced attack eventually created too many problems.
The Spurs no longer depended on one player to carry the offense. Wembanyama could score or draw defensive attention, Fox could create from the perimeter, and Castle could attack gaps and handle the ball.
That balance became one of the defining themes of the series.
Game 4: Spurs Take Command
San Antonio then produced its most convincing defensive performance of the series.
The Spurs beat Portland 114–93 in Game 4, moving one win away from the second round. Wembanyama posted 27 points, 12 rebounds, seven blocks and four steals, while Fox scored 28.
The seven blocks from Wembanyama were particularly striking.
Portland’s Deni Avdija led the Trail Blazers with 26 points, seven rebounds and three assists, but the rest of the offense struggled to match his production. Donovan Clingan, for example, scored only five points while shooting 2-for-10 from the field.
San Antonio had effectively turned the series into a matchup where Portland needed an exceptional offensive night simply to stay close.
Game 5: San Antonio Finishes the Job
The final game was never really in doubt.
San Antonio jumped ahead early and never trailed, eventually winning 114–95. The Spurs opened the game with a 17–4 run and led by as many as 28 points.
Wembanyama’s 17 points, 14 rebounds and six blocks gave the Spurs the interior control they needed. Fox added 21 points and nine assists, while Julian Champagnie scored 19 points and made five of seven three-pointers. Dylan Harper also contributed 17 points off the bench.
For Portland, Avdija finished with 22 points, but the team’s overall offense could not keep pace.
San Antonio shot 40% from three-point range in the closeout game, while its balanced scoring made Portland’s defensive task even harder.
Spurs vs Trail Blazers Player Stats: Who Won the Statistical Battle?
| Category | San Antonio Spurs | Portland Trail Blazers |
|---|---|---|
| Series result | Won 4–1 | Lost 1–4 |
| Series high scorer | Wembanyama, 35 | Avdija, 30 |
| Leading series scorer average | Fox, 20.2 PPG | Avdija, 22.2 PPG |
| Leading assists | Fox, 6.8 APG | Holiday, 7.2 APG |
| Leading rebounds among listed leaders | Wembanyama, 8.8 RPG | Avdija, 6.0 RPG |
| Three-point standout | Wembanyama, 53.8% | Henderson, 46.4% |
| Biggest win | 120–108 | 106–103 |
| Series outcome | Advanced | Eliminated |
The table highlights an interesting point: Portland had the higher individual scoring average from its top scorer, but San Antonio had the stronger overall balance. That difference ultimately mattered more than any single scoring statistic.
Why San Antonio Won the Series
Three factors stand out from the player statistics.
1. San Antonio had multiple creators
Fox and Castle both averaged around 20 points per game while also producing six or more assists. That meant Portland could not concentrate its entire defensive strategy on Wembanyama.
2. Wembanyama controlled the defensive end
His 4.0 blocks per game in the series were extraordinary, and his 14-rebound, six-block Game 5 performance showed how much he could influence the game without needing a huge scoring total.
3. San Antonio responded after Portland’s Game 2 comeback
Portland’s best chance was turning Game 2 into the start of a run. Instead, San Antonio won the next three games by increasingly convincing margins.
That ability to respond is often what separates a promising team from one capable of surviving playoff pressure.
What Portland Can Take From the Series
The 4–1 result was disappointing for Portland, but the series provided valuable evidence about the team’s young core.
Avdija showed that he could carry a substantial offensive workload in playoff basketball. Henderson’s 31-point Game 2 performance demonstrated his scoring ceiling, while Donovan Clingan’s rebounding and interior presence offered another piece for the team’s future.
Portland’s biggest challenge was consistency.
The Trail Blazers could produce enough offense to beat San Antonio in Game 2, but sustaining that level against a defense anchored by Wembanyama proved difficult.
What the Series Means for San Antonio
For San Antonio, the first-round victory represented more than simply moving into the next round.
The Spurs demonstrated that their offense does not have to revolve entirely around Wembanyama. Fox can take over stretches of games, Castle can create and score, and shooters such as Champagnie can punish defenses that overcommit elsewhere.
The depth also showed itself in Game 5. Champagnie’s five three-pointers and Harper’s 17 points helped turn the closeout into a team victory rather than a one-man performance.
That is an encouraging formula for a team trying to make a deeper postseason run.
Spurs vs Trail Blazers Match Player Stats Timeline
Game 1 → Spurs establish control
Wembanyama scores 35 → San Antonio wins 111–98 → Spurs lead 1–0.
Game 2 → Portland responds
Henderson scores 31 → Trail Blazers win 106–103 → Series tied 1–1.
Game 3 → Castle takes over
Castle scores 33 → Spurs win 120–108 → San Antonio leads 2–1.
Game 4 → Wembanyama dominates defensively
27 points, 12 rebounds, 7 blocks → Spurs win 114–93 → San Antonio leads 3–1.
Game 5 → Spurs close it out
Wembanyama records 17 points, 14 rebounds and 6 blocks → San Antonio wins 114–95 → Spurs advance 4–1.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the Spurs vs Trail Blazers playoff series?
Deni Avdija averaged 22.2 points per game for Portland across the five games, while Victor Wembanyama averaged 21.0 points in his four appearances for San Antonio. De’Aaron Fox averaged 20.2 points.
How many games did the Spurs win against the Trail Blazers?
San Antonio won the 2026 Western Conference first-round series 4–1. Portland’s only victory came in Game 2, a 106–103 win in San Antonio.
Who had the most points in the series?
Victor Wembanyama scored 35 points in Game 1, the highest single-game scoring total recorded by either team during the five-game series.
Who led the Spurs in assists?
De’Aaron Fox averaged 6.8 assists per game during the series, narrowly ahead of Stephon Castle’s 6.0.
Who led Portland in assists?
Jrue Holiday averaged 7.2 assists per game over the five games, making him Portland’s leading playmaker statistically.
How many blocks did Victor Wembanyama average?
Wembanyama averaged 4.0 blocks per game in his four appearances during the series. He recorded six blocks in the decisive Game 5 and seven in Game 4.
What was the final score of Game 5?
The Spurs defeated the Trail Blazers 114–95 on April 28, 2026, at Frost Bank Center. The victory gave San Antonio a 4–1 series win and sent the Spurs into the Western Conference semifinals.
Who had the best overall performance in the series?
There is a strong case for Victor Wembanyama because of his two-way impact, particularly his rebounding and shot-blocking. However, De’Aaron Fox and Stephon Castle were also crucial because their scoring and playmaking prevented Portland from simply loading up its defense against Wembanyama.
Final Takeaway
The San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers match player stats from the 2026 playoff series show why San Antonio advanced in five games. Portland had an outstanding scoring presence in Deni Avdija and received important contributions from Henderson and Holiday, but the Spurs had more ways to win.
Wembanyama controlled the paint. Fox supplied veteran shot creation and playmaking. Castle added another dynamic offensive option, while supporting players such as Champagnie and Harper stepped forward when needed.
The most telling statistic may therefore be the simplest one: San Antonio won four of the five games.
The Trail Blazers proved they could challenge the Spurs, especially during the Game 2 comeback. But after that setback, San Antonio tightened its defense, found reliable scoring from several players and closed the series with three straight victories.
For a young Spurs team, that combination of star power, depth and playoff composure made the matchup an important marker of where the franchise was heading next.
